ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 掲載誌一覧
  2. 鹿児島大学水産学部紀要
  3. vol.18
  1. 水産学部
  2. 水産学部・紀要論文

風洞天秤による角型舵と流線型舵との性能比較模型試験について

http://hdl.handle.net/10232/13817
http://hdl.handle.net/10232/13817
1fbf4839-b98b-449d-95ff-12f15162f041
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
AN00040498_v18_p125-136.pdf AN00040498_v18_p125-136.pdf (2.4 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2015-06-19
タイトル
タイトル 風洞天秤による角型舵と流線型舵との性能比較模型試験について
タイトル言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル On a Test of the Steerability-comparison between the two Rudder-models, a Rectangular Cross-section one and a Streamline Cross-section one, with the Use of the Wind Tunnel Balance
タイトル言語 en
著者 奈良迫, 嘉一

× 奈良迫, 嘉一

WEKO 103707

ja 奈良迫, 嘉一

en NARASAKO, Yoshikazu

Search repository
中山, 博

× 中山, 博

WEKO 103708

ja 中山, 博

en NAKAYAMA, Hiroshi

Search repository
井料, 正弘

× 井料, 正弘

WEKO 103709

ja 井料, 正弘

en IRYO, Masahiro

Search repository
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
要約
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Concerning the characteristic effectiveness of the specially deformed rectangular cross-section Rudder, built in the ship-building yards in Kagoshima Prefecture, and adopted in Yamakawa and some other districts, there has been made no researches in ascertaining its merits in comparison with the typical stream-line cross-section Rudder used far more widely. This is the reason why a test was carried out on the steerability-comparison between the above mentioned two Rudder-models, a Rectangular Cross-section one and a Stream-line Cross-section one, with the use of the Wind Tunnel Balance newly set in our Faculty, the items ascertained are as in the following : In Rectangular Cross-section Rudder, both Lift Coefficient (C_L) and Drag Coefficient (C_D) are larger than those in Stream Line Cross-section one. But under the usual Rudder angle 10~25°, the increased percentage of the Lift Coefficient is considerably larger than that of the Drag Coefficient ; namely, under the biggest Steerability, when Reynolds number is 1.8×10^4, the increased percentage is 30% ; likewise, when 4.0×10^4, it is 23% ; when 5.9×10^4, it is 18% ; when 7.8×10^4, it is 14% ; which shows that the effectiveness of the Rectangular Cross-section Rudder is obviously higher than that of the Stream-line Cross-section Rudder, which also means that the former is superior to the latter. In this case, it is without saying that the disadvantage in the form of the Rudder Drag is accompanied inevitably. But, as is to be seen in the following table the amount of the Drag under the above mentioned Reynolds number is, at its maximum, 24%, 13%, 10%, 7% respectively. Hence, the reasonable conclusion that, at least, on board of the small sized vessels operating within narrow bays and coves, and in which Rudder effectiveness rather than the Navigation speed is necessitated, the popular use of this type of Rudder might be encouraged more widely than it is to-day. [The rest is omitted.]
内容記述言語 en
収録雑誌名 ja : 鹿児島大学水産学部紀要
en : Memoirs of Faculty of Fisheries Kagoshima University

巻 18, p. 125-136, 発行日 1969-12-25
作成日
日付 1969-12-25
日付タイプ Issued
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
ISSN 0453087X
NII書誌ID(雑誌)
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
NC ID AN00040498
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
NDC
主題Scheme NDC
主題 660
公開者・出版者
出版者 鹿児島大学
出版者言語 ja
公開者・出版者
出版者 Kagoshima University
出版者言語 en
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-07-25 12:23:10.555428
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3