@article{oai:ir.kagoshima-u.ac.jp:00002787,
 author = {塚田, 澄代 and Tsukada, Sumiyo},
 journal = {鹿児島大学歯学部紀要},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The philosophers Marcel and Heidegger, who were both active during the same period in the  21 century, examined the existence of human beings living here and now and going beyond that, searched for our essential being. In other words, they searched for the being based on existence. In this article both philosophers' concepts of existence and being as well as the relationship between these concepts were compared. For both philosophers a corrupt existence is daily existence where oneself is lost within super-ficial inquisitiveness. Marcel calls this the degradation of existence but at the same time acknowledges the exuberant experience of existence. However, for Heidegger, essential existence means understanding the meaning of the reality of death and accepting the anxiety associated with nothingness. In his later writings Heidegger does not question being from the point of view of existence but talks about being based on self-disclosure. Considering this point, Marcel holds Heidegger's achievement of recognizing the connection between the concepts of being and sanctity in high esteem. Nevertheless, Marcel regrets that Heidegger does not adequately evaluate a neighbor's concept, which approaches intersubjective being.},
 pages = {29--33},
 title = {マルセルとハイデガーにおける実存と存在についての考察},
 volume = {33},
 year = {2013}
}